Where Does
Rigor Fit? - Kylene Beers
What is Close Reading?
Defining the Signposts
Explaining the Signposts
Wondrous Word: Writers and Writing in the Elementary Classroom by Katie Wood Ray
Mini-lessons for Literature Circles by Harvey Daniels and Nancy Steineke
What is Close Reading?
Defining the Signposts
Explaining the Signposts
Wondrous Word: Writers and Writing in the Elementary Classroom by Katie Wood Ray
Mini-lessons for Literature Circles by Harvey Daniels and Nancy Steineke
SAY
I remember when I was in
my AP Lit class in high school and we had the option of choosing 3 books for a
final project. This project required us to take a “great literary work” and
have a conversation with the author. This sounds like a fun project—one in
which you allow your students to explore creatively and freely, no? It would
have been that way for me, except the books were way too difficult to read and
understand and we were expected to work on this alone. I knew that I liked
English for a while, but I can admit at the moment I felt too overwhelmed and
underprepared. My teacher thought that because we were the top of our class in
an advanced placement course that the rigor of the work needed to be comparable
to the course we were taking. After reading the articles for this week, I see
that she could not have been more wrong! “Rigor is not an attribute of a text,
but rather a characteristic of our behavior with that text. Put another way,
rigor resides in the energy and attention given to the text, not in the text
itself” (Beers, 21). Some teachers of English tend to be the elitist classroom practitioners
who hold the belief that because they have their students reading books from
hundreds of years ago that this creates an environment that is both rigorous
and academically challenging, when in reality it creates an environment in
which students are not able to conceptualize and understand what is being studied.
Rigor, according to Beers, comes from the level of commitment and dedication spent
with a text. If students are struggling to understand a text, but they (and
you) are putting all your energy together into taking that text piece by piece
until you understand it, this is what makes your curriculum rigorous. “If they
are to read rigorously, students must be committed to understanding some
intriguing character, to solving some problem, to figuring out what a writer
believes or values and how those thoughts compare with their own…” (Beers, 22).
Obviously we understand that
in order to obtain this level of rigor in the classroom, we need to be scaffolding
students to get to this level of thought. To do this, we need to be using much
more close reading and reader response in our classes. I believe that for every
close reading that takes place in the classroom, some sort of reader response
needs to be added as well. Getting our students to think about a topic prior to
digging in the text is a sure way to get them to make those personal and world
connections to the text—and isn’t this what we want? I can admit that even though
formal analysis is extremely important, I am someone who values reader response
over it any day. I believe that in order for our students to become better
readers, and even better writers, they need to go “there”. They need to have
some sort of connection with the text prior to being tasked with understanding
it. If you can make a student feel a certain way about a book before he reads
it, you have won him over just a little bit more than if you tried to convince
him this book is good because blah blah blah. Reader response and close reading
work so well together in this regard. After you have students give their reader
response, you employ a close reading for them and the “close reading should
suggest close attention to the text; close attention to the relevant experience,
thought and memory of the reader…” (WICR, 37). Having the two work together
will then help the reader to make sense of their own memories as it relates to
the text as well as help them take a smaller passage of the text and understand
it too. But one key essential part is tying it all together again and making
that connection with the bigger picture. Making sure that you come full circle
and showing an understanding of the work as a whole. Sure this may take longer,
but breaking it down and doing close readings will help ensure that your
readers are understanding the text and relating it to those personal, world,
and other textual memories.
The articles regarding
signposts are simply amazing (shout out to B & P). Yes, I would use this in
my middle school classroom, but the ideas are so practical and useful within
the classroom and I think they would really help when you are trying to make
sure that students are understanding the text. Making those connections are essential
to your becoming a stronger reader.
Do:
My do for the week is an example of student work in which they were asked to incorporate these same details in there own work with a book report.
Davontae,
ReplyDeleteI love how you are constantly thinking about the readability and who your students are as learners. So many students, even the "english lovers", have had that experience where a teacher gives them assignments or texts that have not been properly scaffolding, leading them to hate the novel or lose motivation in doing the assignment. It is so important to grab the students, whether they are struggling or proficient readers. I think your do is great for showing how students can predict, question, and do formal analysis with a text! What do you think about teaching students to read like writers?
“Rigor is not an attribute of a text, but rather a characteristic of our behavior with that text." What a solid quote. While i agree with it, I think that your teacher was following suite with the idea of Beers, she was just not supporting the students enough. Beers, as you say thinks that the "level of commitment and dedication spent with a text [defines rigor]. If students are struggling to understand a text" then you seem to argue that the course is not rigorous...While I understand your ultimate point about not just throwing work at students--I'm just being pedantic and rude about your argument. But it's important to note that by your agreement with Beers you understand what true rigor should look like, and realizing that even if the teacher has challenging expectations and work, if the students are not responding to the texts well, then the rigor cannot occur.
ReplyDelete